In the first week of 2026, President Donald Trump’s administration has taken a series of unilateral military and diplomatic actions that have drawn sharp criticism from international leaders and legal experts.
The most controversial of these was the U.S. raid in Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, sparking questions about international law, sovereignty, and the potential for escalating conflicts in the Western Hemisphere.
Venezuela Raid Sparks Legal and Humanitarian Concerns
On January 3, U.S. special forces conducted a predawn raid in Caracas, capturing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. The White House described the operation as a “lawful arrest”, citing indictments on drug trafficking and narco-terrorism charges. Maduro has condemned the raid as a “kidnapping”, declaring himself a “prisoner of war.”
Experts warn that the operation may violate international law and the United Nations Charter, which prohibits acts of aggression against sovereign nations. The U.S. announcement that it will temporarily run Venezuela to protect stability and reclaim oil interests has been widely criticized as an unprecedented intervention that risks turning the country into a de facto U.S. protectorate.
Escalating Threats Alarm Other Nations
Following the raid, Trump’s administration issued threats toward multiple countries, raising fears of broader instability:
- Colombia: Trump accused President Gustavo Petro of drug ties and hinted at possible military action.
- Cuba: Predicted collapse of the government without Venezuelan support, signaling potential interference.
- Greenland: Reiterated U.S. interest in control for national security, keeping military options open despite Danish opposition.
- Iran: Warned of severe U.S. retaliation if authorities suppressed domestic protests.
These statements suggest a return to interventionist policies, reminiscent of early 20th-century unilateralism, raising questions about U.S. commitment to diplomacy and multilateral agreements.
Ongoing Conflicts and Counterterrorism
The U.S. has continued military operations abroad, including strikes in Nigeria, Somalia, and Syria, targeting terrorist groups. While officials describe these as counterterrorism efforts, critics note that repeated foreign military involvement without clear oversight increases risk of civilian harm and prolonged conflicts.
Domestic Backlash
On January 7, an ICE operation in Minneapolis resulted in the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Renee Good. Federal authorities claim self-defense, alleging she attempted to strike agents with her vehicle. Local leaders, including Mayor Jacob Frey and Governor Tim Walz, disputed this account and demanded a halt to ICE operations, prompting widespread protests. This incident highlights tensions surrounding Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement policies.
Fragile Peace in Gaza
A U.S.-brokered ceasefire in Gaza remains tenuous. Despite the truce, ongoing Israeli strikes and aid restrictions have resulted in hundreds of Palestinian deaths since October 2025. Critics argue that Trump’s unilateral foreign policy may undermine peace efforts and inflame regional tensions.
Global and Domestic Implications
Trump’s early 2026 actions have sparked polarized reactions. Internationally, analysts warn that unilateral interventions and threats could strain alliances, provoke retaliatory actions, and damage U.S. credibility. Domestically, incidents like the Minneapolis ICE operation fuel public unrest and raise concerns about civil rights and accountability.
While the administration frames these moves as decisive, experts caution that unilateral military interventions, aggressive threats, and high-risk enforcement policies may destabilize global regions and deepen domestic divisions.
