Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    NoMusica.com
    • AI
    • Tech
      • Electronics & Gadgets
      • Apps & Updates
      • Smartphones
    • Films & Shows
    • Music
    • Gaming
    • Streaming
    • Music Production
    NoMusica.com
    Home Spotify Accused of Using “Ghost Artists” to Lower Royalty Payouts
    Streaming

    Spotify Accused of Using “Ghost Artists” to Lower Royalty Payouts

    2 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram WhatsApp Copy Link
    Spotify Premium

    A new report has revealed that Spotify may be using low-cost, pseudonymous tracks in its playlists to reduce royalty payments to real musicians.

    According to an investigation by Liz Pelly, published in Harper’s Magazine, Spotify’s Perfect Fit Content (PFC) program has been secretly embedding these tracks into popular playlists.

    The PFC program, which began in the 2010s, reportedly uses “ghost artists” who work under fake names. These artists are paid small upfront fees, while Spotify keeps all the rights to the music.

    This allows the company to make more profit by promoting these low-cost tracks, instead of supporting artists who are trying to earn a fair wage.

    The program has been added to hundreds of playlists, according to Pelly’s report. These playlists, once seen as a way for new artists to get discovered, are now being used as tools for cost-cutting. This has led to a growing concern that Spotify is prioritizing profits over the interests of musicians.

    The PFC program has drawn comparisons to Spotify’s Discovery Mode, where artists agree to lower royalty payments in exchange for increased promotion.

    Both initiatives are seen as ways for Spotify to manipulate its platform for financial gain, at the expense of the artists who depend on it.

    Pelly explained that Spotify had marketed itself as the best platform for discovering new music, but these programs undermine that promise.

    Instead of discovering unique, original music, listeners are finding tracks created for the sole purpose of cutting costs.

    As Spotify continues to grow, these revelations raise important questions about the company’s commitment to supporting artists and whether it is truly a platform that values creativity and fair compensation.

    Spotify
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram WhatsApp Copy Link
    Sazid Kabir
    • Website
    • X (Twitter)
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn

    Founder & Chief Editor, NoMusica.com. Sazid Kabir is a tech writer and music producer covering music, tech, and music production with both analytical and practical experience.

    Related Posts

    500 Artists With the Most Spotify Monthly Listeners (Updated 2026)

    15 Free Online Movie Streaming Sites That Actually Work in 2026

    Can You Upload AI Music to Spotify? (Rules Explained)

    YouTube Monetization Explained: How Much Creators Actually Earn

    How Creators Make Money on Spotify (Royalties Explained)

    Best Free Live TV Apps with No Subscription in 2026

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Latest Posts

    Travis Scott Drops Cactus Jack Nike Phantom 6 For 2026 World Cup

    June 7, 2026

    Netflix Corruption: Michael Jackson Film is False & Slander, Here’s the Documented Facts

    June 7, 2026

    Cassie Ventura Fled U.S. with Diddy’s $30M,  Her Innocence Now in Question

    June 5, 2026

    50 Cent Says Daphne Joy’s OnlyFans Up 85% After Diddy Tape, Hints Model Leaked Her Own Tape

    June 5, 2026

    NEW HIPHOP THIS FRIDAY (JUNE 5, 2026)

    June 5, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 A WowPress Initiative

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.